Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) accused Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey of making a “false” statement “under oath” at a hearing on Big Tech censorship. The senator complained that Dorsey said the bombshell “@nypost story alleging Biden’s CCP corruption” could be tweeted. “Still blocked,” tweeted Cruz.
The fallout was the perfect top to a contentious hearing. Senate Republicans had been itching to confront Twitter and Facebook about the censorship of the Post story that claimed to expose alleged corrupt dealings of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden in Ukraine.
In a much-anticipated hearing on October 28, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and Dorsey appeared before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation to defend themselves against both left and right.
Senator Roger Wicker (R-MS) confronted Dorsey, and said that his platform “allows foreign dictators to post propaganda typically without restriction, yet you routinely restrict the president of the United States.” Wicker then cited two examples: The first was Twitter allowing a Chinese official to scapegoat the U.S. military for spreading the virus to Wuhan, China. The second example was how Twitter allowed Ayatollah Khamenei of Iran to “glorify violence.” One tweet described Israel as a “cancerous growth” and that the only remedy to its regime is “firm, armed resistance.”
Several senators, including Sens. John Thune (R-SD) and Cruz specifically discussed Twitter’s censorship and Facebook’s suppression of the Post’s story.
Cruz was not taking any of Twitter’s excuses. Dorsey claimed that Twitter does not influence elections, to which Cruz fired back: “if you don’t believe you have the power to influence elections, why do you block anything?” Dorsey responded that the Post’s story violated Twitter’s hacked materials policy. Cruz called this policy “facially, highly dubious.” Furthermore, Cruz asked, “You can censor The New York Post, you can censor Politico, you can presumably censor The New York Times or any other media outlet, Mr. Dorsey, who the hell elected you?”
Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) pointed out that Twitter has censored President Donald Trump or his campaign 65 times, but has not censored democratic nominee Joe Biden at all.
Several democratic senators, namely Sens. Amy Klobochar (D-MN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and Brian Schatz (D-HI) primarily complained about the fact that the hearing took place so close to the election. At least one Democrat in the committee, Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA), even wanted Big Tech to censor more content.
In a comment to NewsBusters, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said: “After years of flagrant bias against conservatives, Twitter and Facebook crossed the Rubicon two weeks ago when they brazenly censored the Post’s reporting on major allegations of corruption surrounding the Democrat presidential candidate, all just days before one of the most consequential elections in our nation’s history.”
The only time that Section 230 was actually discussed at length during the hearing was from the opening statements of Pichai, Zuckerburg, and Dorsey. They argued that Section 230 protections should remain in place. Pichai argued, “our ability to provide access to a wide range of information is only possible because of existing legal frameworks, like Section 230.” Zuckerberg called for change and more regulation, saying “I believe Congress should update the law to make sure it’s working as intended. We support the ideas around transparency and industry collaboration that are being discussed in some of the current bipartisan proposals.”
Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representative and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency, clarity on “hate speech” and equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored, contact us at the Media Research Center contact form, and help us hold Big Tech accountable.